Build the core model
Read the lesson and connect each concept to the visual model above.
This lab turns AI model evaluation drift into a practical release-governance exercise. Students compare two evaluation snapshots, decide whether a deployment should continue, and document the evidence needed before automation can safely resume.
What students can learn
- How small evaluation changes can create real user-facing release risk.
- How to separate model-quality signals from pipeline, dataset, or prompt changes.
- How CI/CD gates should react when AI behaviour becomes unstable.
- How to communicate an evidence-based rollback, hold, or canary decision.
Recommended classroom use
- Give each group the scenario and ask them to classify the release risk within 10 minutes.
- Ask groups to map each suspected cause to one verification step and one owner.
- Compare proposed CI/CD gate changes, then discuss which controls are useful without over-blocking future releases.
- Close with a short incident memo: decision, evidence, remaining uncertainty, and next release condition.
Extension activity
Ask students to convert the response plan into a lightweight GitHub Actions checklist: evaluation threshold, artifact retention, approval note, rollback trigger, and post-release observation window.
Work with observable evidence
Use the lab to turn the lesson into a repeatable classroom exercise.
Scenario lab
An AI-supported feature appears useful, but the team must prove output quality before release.
Turn AI Evaluation Drift Response Lab into a small evaluation with a human release decision.- Focus
- artificial-intelligence, evaluation, ci/cd
- Evidence target
- An evaluation record containing test input, expected result, observed result, and release decision.
Activity checklist
Write what you observed, what it means, and what should be verified next. This draft stays on this device.
Explain the decision
Confirm what you can observe, what remains uncertain, and what should happen next.
Before completing this lesson
- Name the input, decision point, and outcome shown in the visual.
- Identify one artifact that would count as evidence.
- State one limitation and one next verification step.